Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpGBw2SA/ExIntrod_GM04

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(nats) → MARK(adx(zeros))
TL(mark(X)) → TL(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(nats) → ADX(zeros)
MARK(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(adx(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → INCR(mark(X))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
HD(active(X)) → HD(X)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(tl(X)) → TL(mark(X))
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
INCR(active(X)) → INCR(X)
MARK(tl(X)) → ACTIVE(tl(mark(X)))
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(hd(X)) → ACTIVE(hd(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(tl(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → ADX(Y)
MARK(hd(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(tl(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(zeros) → CONS(0, zeros)
TL(active(X)) → TL(X)
ADX(mark(X)) → ADX(X)
MARK(hd(X)) → HD(mark(X))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → S(X)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → INCR(Y)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)
ADX(active(X)) → ADX(X)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → INCR(cons(X, adx(Y)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → CONS(s(X), incr(Y))
MARK(adx(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → CONS(X, adx(Y))
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(adx(X)) → ADX(mark(X))
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(hd(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(X)
HD(mark(X)) → HD(X)
MARK(nats) → ACTIVE(nats)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(nats) → MARK(adx(zeros))
TL(mark(X)) → TL(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(nats) → ADX(zeros)
MARK(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(adx(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → INCR(mark(X))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
HD(active(X)) → HD(X)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(tl(X)) → TL(mark(X))
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
INCR(active(X)) → INCR(X)
MARK(tl(X)) → ACTIVE(tl(mark(X)))
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(hd(X)) → ACTIVE(hd(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(tl(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → ADX(Y)
MARK(hd(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(tl(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(zeros) → CONS(0, zeros)
TL(active(X)) → TL(X)
ADX(mark(X)) → ADX(X)
MARK(hd(X)) → HD(mark(X))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → S(X)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → INCR(Y)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)
ADX(active(X)) → ADX(X)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → INCR(cons(X, adx(Y)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → CONS(s(X), incr(Y))
MARK(adx(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → CONS(X, adx(Y))
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(adx(X)) → ADX(mark(X))
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(hd(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(X)
HD(mark(X)) → HD(X)
MARK(nats) → ACTIVE(nats)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 7 SCCs with 13 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TL(mark(X)) → TL(X)
TL(active(X)) → TL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TL(mark(X)) → TL(X)
TL(active(X)) → TL(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 1/2 + (3/2)x_1
POL(TL(x₁)) = (1/2)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 9/4 + x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

HD(active(X)) → HD(X)
HD(mark(X)) → HD(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

HD(active(X)) → HD(X)
HD(mark(X)) → HD(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 1/2 + (3/2)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 9/4 + x_1
POL(HD(x₁)) = (1/2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 9/4 + x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1/2 + (3/2)x_1
POL(S(x₁)) = (1/2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)
INCR(active(X)) → INCR(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)
INCR(active(X)) → INCR(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 1/2 + (3/2)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 9/4 + x_1
POL(INCR(x₁)) = (1/2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 1/4 + (3/2)x_1
POL(CONS(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 9/4 + x_1
POL(CONS(x₁, x₂)) = (1/2)x_2
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1/2 + (3/2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADX(active(X)) → ADX(X)
ADX(mark(X)) → ADX(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ADX(active(X)) → ADX(X)
ADX(mark(X)) → ADX(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 1/2 + (3/2)x_1
POL(ADX(x₁)) = (1/2)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 9/4 + x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(nats) → MARK(adx(zeros))
MARK(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(adx(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
MARK(tl(X)) → ACTIVE(tl(mark(X)))
MARK(hd(X)) → ACTIVE(hd(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(tl(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(Y)
MARK(adx(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(hd(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
MARK(tl(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
ACTIVE(hd(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(X)
MARK(nats) → ACTIVE(nats)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(tl(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(Y)
MARK(adx(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(hd(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(tl(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(hd(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(nats) → MARK(adx(zeros))
MARK(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(adx(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
MARK(tl(X)) → ACTIVE(tl(mark(X)))
MARK(hd(X)) → ACTIVE(hd(mark(X)))
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
MARK(nats) → ACTIVE(nats)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(mark(x₁)) = x_1
POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 1/2 + x_1
POL(hd(x₁)) = 7/2 + (4)x_1
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = x_1 + x_2
POL(active(x₁)) = x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1/2 + x_1
POL(adx(x₁)) = 1/2 + (2)x_1
POL(incr(x₁)) = x_1
POL(zeros) = 0
POL(tl(x₁)) = 1/2 + x_1
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(nats) = 1/2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/2.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(nats) → active(nats)
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
mark(0) → active(0)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(nats) → MARK(adx(zeros))
MARK(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(adx(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
MARK(tl(X)) → ACTIVE(tl(mark(X)))
MARK(hd(X)) → ACTIVE(hd(mark(X)))
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
MARK(nats) → ACTIVE(nats)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(tl(X)) → ACTIVE(tl(mark(X)))
MARK(hd(X)) → ACTIVE(hd(mark(X)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(nats) → MARK(adx(zeros))
MARK(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(adx(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
MARK(nats) → ACTIVE(nats)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(mark(x₁)) = 2 + (4)x_1
POL(0) = 2
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 0
POL(hd(x₁)) = 1/4 + (1/2)x_1
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(active(x₁)) = 7/2 + (4)x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = (1/2)x_1
POL(adx(x₁)) = 0
POL(incr(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(zeros) = 0
POL(tl(x₁)) = 1/4 + (7/4)x_1
POL(s(x₁)) = 1/4 + (13/4)x_1
POL(nats) = 0

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(nats) → MARK(adx(zeros))
MARK(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(adx(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))
MARK(nats) → ACTIVE(nats)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(nats) → MARK(adx(zeros))
MARK(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(adx(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(nats) → ACTIVE(nats)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(mark(x₁)) = 0
POL(0) = 7/2
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x_1
POL(hd(x₁)) = 7/2 + (5/2)x_1
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(active(x₁)) = 3/2
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1/4
POL(adx(x₁)) = 1/4
POL(incr(x₁)) = 1/4
POL(zeros) = 1/4
POL(tl(x₁)) = 3/2 + (11/4)x_1
POL(s(x₁)) = (3)x_1
POL(nats) = 1/4

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(nats) → MARK(adx(zeros))
MARK(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(adx(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(nats) → ACTIVE(nats)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(nats) → MARK(adx(zeros))
MARK(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(adx(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(nats) → ACTIVE(nats)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(nats) → ACTIVE(nats)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(nats) → MARK(adx(zeros))
MARK(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(adx(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(mark(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 0
POL(hd(x₁)) = 0
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(active(x₁)) = 7/2 + (4)x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = (1/2)x_1
POL(adx(x₁)) = 0
POL(incr(x₁)) = x_1
POL(zeros) = 0
POL(tl(x₁)) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = (2)x_1
POL(nats) = 1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/2.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(nats) → MARK(adx(zeros))
MARK(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(adx(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(adx(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(adx(mark(X)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(mark(x₁)) = x_1
POL(0) = 11/4
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 0
POL(hd(x₁)) = 9/4 + (1/4)x_1
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(active(x₁)) = 13/4 + x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(adx(x₁)) = 4
POL(incr(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(zeros) = 4
POL(tl(x₁)) = 11/4 + (7/4)x_1
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(nats) = 15/4

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(mark(x₁)) = x_1
POL(0) = 11/4
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 1/2
POL(hd(x₁)) = (1/2)x_1
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(active(x₁)) = 3/2 + (9/4)x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = (1/4)x_1
POL(adx(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(incr(x₁)) = 2 + x_1
POL(zeros) = 1
POL(tl(x₁)) = 4 + (11/4)x_1
POL(s(x₁)) = (1/4)x_1
POL(nats) = 9/4

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/2.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                          ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(mark(x₁)) = x_1
POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (2)x_1
POL(hd(x₁)) = 2 + (4)x_1
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = (1/4)x_1 + (5/4)x_2
POL(active(x₁)) = x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = (2)x_1
POL(adx(x₁)) = 1/4 + (4)x_1
POL(incr(x₁)) = (1/2)x_1
POL(zeros) = 0
POL(tl(x₁)) = 4 + (2)x_1
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(nats) = 1/2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(nats) → active(nats)
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
mark(0) → active(0)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                          ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                              ↳ QDP

                                                ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(incr(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(Y)))
active(adx(cons(X, Y))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(Y))))
active(hd(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tl(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
mark(nats) → active(nats)
mark(adx(X)) → active(adx(mark(X)))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(hd(X)) → active(hd(mark(X)))
mark(tl(X)) → active(tl(mark(X)))
adx(mark(X)) → adx(X)
adx(active(X)) → adx(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
hd(mark(X)) → hd(X)
hd(active(X)) → hd(X)
tl(mark(X)) → tl(X)
tl(active(X)) → tl(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.